Αποκαταστατική Οδοντιατρική σε παιδιά Ι. Υλικά και πρωτόκολλα.

Δεν υπάρχουν Γενικές Προαπαιτήσεις

Επικοινωνία με φοιτητές μέσω email

Η αξιολόγηση των φοιτητών γίνεται στο τέλος του εξαμήνου με γραπτές εξετάσεις οι οποίες περιλαμβάνουν σύντομες ή εκτεταμένες απαντήσεις κειμένου σε 5-10 ερωτήσεις.

Δεν παρέχεται βιβλιογραφία μέσω του Εύδοξου

1. Pit and Fissure Sealants (FSs) I. The effectiveness of FSs in decreasing carious lesions. Factors that affect the effectiveness of FSs in caries reduction. Relationship between cost and benefits by the application of FSs. • Papageorgiou SN, Dimitraki D, Kotsanos N, Bekes K, van Waes H. Performance of pit and fissure sealants according to tooth characteristics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2017 Nov;66:8-17 • Tellez M, Gray SL, Gray S, Lim S, Ismail AI. Sealants and dental caries: dentists' perspectives on evidence-based recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Sep;142(9):1033-40 • Welbury R, Raadal M, Lygidakis NA; European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. EAPD guidelines for the use of pit and fissure sealants. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2004 Sep;5(3):179-84 • Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Nový BB, Dhar V, Donly K, Hewlett ER, Quinonez RB, Chaffin J, Crespin M, Iafolla T, Siegal MD, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Carrasco-Labra A. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Aug;147(8):672-682 • Schwendicke F, Jäger AM, Paris S, Hsu LY, Tu YK. Treating pit-and-fissure caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015 Apr;94(4):522-33 • Oong EM, Griffin SO, Kohn WG, Gooch BF, Caufield PW. The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions: a review of the evidence. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Mar;139(3):271-8; quiz 357-8 • Muller-Bolla M, Lupi-Pégurier L, Tardieu C, Velly AM, Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;34(5):321- • Kolavic Gray S, Griffin SO, Malvitz DM, Gooch BF. A comparison of the effects of toothbrushing and handpiece prophylaxis on retention of sealants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Jan;140(1):38-46. • Hiiri A, Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD003067 • Feigal R.J. The use of pit and fissure sealants. Pediatr. Dent. 2002;24:415–422 • Duggal MS, Tahmassebi JF, Toumba KJ, Mavromati C. The effect of different etching times on the retention of fissure sealants in second primary and first permanent molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1997 Jun;7(2):81-6. 2. Pit and Fissure Sealants (FSs) II. Materials used as FSs (Glass Ionomer, Compomers, Composite resin, Resin-based materials). How can resin-based materials be distinguished according to bonding system, the color of materials and the addition or not of reinforcing agents. Fluoride-releasing PFSs materials (fluoride release, retention, reduction in caries) • Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Nový BB, Dhar V, Donly K, Hewlett ER, Quinonez RB, Chaffin J, Crespin M, Iafolla T, Siegal MD, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Carrasco-Labra A. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Aug;147(8):672-682.e12. • Reddy VR, Chowdhary N, Mukunda K, Kiran N, Kavyarani B, Pradeep M. Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealants: A comparative clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6: S18–S23. • Puppin-Rontani R.M., Baglioni-Gouvea M.E., deGoes M.F., Garcia-Godoy F. Compomer as a pit and fissure sealant: Effectiveness and retention after 24 months. J. Dent. Child. 2006;73:31–36. • Maher M.M., Elkashlan H.I., El-Housseiny A.A. Effectiveness of a self-etching adhesive on sealant retention in primary teeth. Pediatr. Dent. 2013;35:351–354. • Kühnisch J., Mansmann U., Heinrich-Weltzien R., Hickel R. Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing—Results from a meta-analysis. Dent. Mater. 2012;28:298–303. • Hicks J., Garcia-Gody F., Flaitz C. Biological factors in dental caries: Role of remineralization and fluoride in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part 3) J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2004;28:203–214. • Beauchamp J. , Caufield P.W.,Crall J.J., Donly K., Feigal R., Gooch B, Ismail A., Kohn W., Siegal M., Simonsen R. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants. A report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs, 2008 JADA, Vol. 139 • Kloukos D., Pandis N., Eliades T. In vivo bisphenol-a release from dental pit and fissure sealants: A systematic review. J. Dent. 2013;41:659–667. • Eliades T., Eliades G. Plastics in Dentistry and Estrogenicity: A Guide to Safe. Practice. Springer; Berlin, Germany: 2014. • Cury JA, de Oliveira BH, dos Santos AP, Tenuta LM. Are fluoride releasing dental materials clinically effective on caries control? Dent Mater. 2016 Mar;32(3):323-33. 3. Pit and Fissure Sealants (FSs) III. Factors associated with the technique of positioning and affecting the retention of FSs. Methods of occlusal surface’s preparation (Polishing, Air-abrasion, mechanical preparation with carbides). The importance of isolation. The contribution of use of bonding systems before the use of FS material. The association of the type and the position of the tooth with the retention of FS materials. • Arhakis A, Damianaki S, Toumba KJ. Pit and Fissure Sealants: Types, Effectiveness, Retention, and Fluoride Release: A Literature Review. Balk J Stom, 2007; 11:151-162. • Collette J, Wilson S, Sullivan D. A study of the Isolite system during sealant placement: efficacy and patient acceptance. Pediatr Dent, 2010; 32:146-150. • Dennison JB, Straffon LH, More FG. Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;121(5):610–614. • Duangthip D, Lussi A. Effects of fissure cleaning methods, drying agents, and fissure morphology on microleakage and penetration ability of sealants in vitro. Pediatr Dent, 2003;25:527-533. • Feigal RJ, Hitt J, Splieth C. Retaining sealant on salivary contaminated enamel. J Am Dent Assoc, 1993; 124:88-97. • Muller-Bolla M, Lupi-Pégurier L, Tardieu C, Velly AM, Antomarchi C. Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;34(5):321-36. • Garcia-Godoy F, de Araujo FB. Enhancement of fissure sealant penetration and adaptation: the enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994;19(1):13-8. • Hatibovic-Kofman S, Butler SA, Sadek H. Microleakage of three sealants following conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11(6):409-16. • Lygidakis N, Oulis K, Christodoulidis A. Evaluation of fissure sealants retention following four different isolation and surface preparation techniques: Four years clinical trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1994;19(1):23-5. 4. The role of isolation in restorations of primary and permanent teeth (including Preventive Resin Restoration and Pit and Fissure Sealants). Methods of isolation. Advantages – Disadvantages. Comparative studies regarding the effectiveness. Clinical studies, systematic revies/meta-analyses – evidence. • Alhareky MS, Mermelstein D, Finkelman M, Alhumaid J, Loo C. EHiciency and patient satisfaction with the Isolite system versus rubber dam for sealant placement in pediatric patients. Pediatric Dentistry. 2014;36(5):400-4. • Bücher K, Metz I, Pitchika V, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Survival characteristics of composite restorations in primary teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2015;19(7):1653-62. • Hill EE and Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? Journal of Dental Education. 2008;72(10):1177-81. • Mendes ACB, Restrepo M, Azevedo ER, Cordeiro RCL, SantosPinto L, Zuanon ACC. Effect of rubber dam clamps on demineralized cervical enamel of permanent teeth. Journal of Dentistry for Children. 2018;85(1):3-7. • Miao C, Yang X, Wong MC, Zou J, Zhou X, Li C, Wang Y. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(5). • Ripa LW and Wolff MS. Preventive resin restorations: indications, technique, and success. Quintessence International. 1992;23(5). • Vanhée T, Tassignon C, Porta P, Bottenberg P, Charle, T, Vanden AA. Behavior of Children during Dental Care with Rubber Dam Isolation: A Randomized Controlled Study. Dentistry journal. 2021;9(8):89. • Wang Y, Li C, Yuan H, Wong MC, Zou J, Shi Z, Zhou X. (2016). Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 9(9), CD009858. • ChIn SM, Ferguson JW, Bajurnows Τ. Latex allergy ίη dentistry. Revίew and report οί case presenting as a serίοus reaction to latex dental dam. Aust Dent J 2004;49: 146-8. • Duggal MS, Curson MEJ, Fayle SA, Pollard ΜΑ, Robertson AJ. Restorative Τechnίques ίη Ρaedίatrίc Dentistry. 1st ed. London Μartίn Dunitz. 1995: 27. 5. Types of restorations in primary anterior teeth. Types of cavity preparation in small carious lesions. Methods to enhance the retention of restorations. Restoration of extensive carious lesions in primary anterior molars (apart from aesthetic crowns). Comparative studies and systematic reviews regarding the retention and materials. • Croll TP, Berg J. Simplified primary incisor proximal restorations. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(1):67–70. • Dhar V, Hsu KL, Coll JA, Ginsberg E, Ball BM, Chhibber S, Johnson M, Kim M, Modaresi N, Tinanoff N, Evidence-based Update of Pediatric Dental Restorative Procedures: Dental Materials. J Clinical Pediatr Dent, 2015;39: 303-310. • Donly KJ, Garcia-Godoy F. The use of resin-based composite in children. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:480–8. • Durante A Claudia, Wanderely MT. Biological restoration of primary anterior teeth. Quintessence International 2000; 31(6) 404-406. • Eshghi A, Kowsari-Isfahan R, Khoroushi M. Evaluation of three restorative techniques for primary anterior teeth with extensive carious lesions: a 1-year clinical study. J Dent Child (Chic) 2013 May-Aug;80(2):80-87. • Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. The clinical and radiographic success of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 2003;25:577-81. • Lee JK. Restoration of primary anterior teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):506-10. • Piyapinyo S, White GE. Class III cavity preparation in primary anterior teeth: in vitro retention comparison of conventional and modified forms. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1998;22(2):107–112. • Ram D, Fuks AB Clinical performance of resin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors: a retrospective study. Int J of Paediatr Dent 2006; 16:49–54 • Waggoner WF. Anterior crowns for primary anterior teeth: An evidence-based assessment of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2006;7(2):53-7. 6. Class I cavities in primary molars. What material to use (Amalgam, Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified glass ionomer, Compomer, High-viscosity glass ionomer, bioactive materials like Activa). Factors affecting the choice. Comparative studies, systematic reviews. Clinical studies – evidence. Stamp technique. • Papathanasiou A, Curzon M, Fairpo C. The Influence Of Restorative Material On The Survival Rate Of The Restorations In Primary Molars. Pediatr Dent. 1994; 16: 282-8. • Croll TP, Bar-Zion V, Segura A, Donly KJ. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth – A retrospective evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1110–1116. • Donly KJ. Restorative dentistry for children. Dent Clin North Am 2013; 57: 75–82. • Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, García-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005;18(3):198-211. • Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62(1):37-45. • Amaireh AI, Al-Jundi SH, Alshraideh HA. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in primary teeth restored with three adhesive materials: ACTIVA™, composite resin, and resin-modified glass ionomer. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(4): 359–67 • da Franca, C., Colares, V., & Van Amerongen, E. (2011). Two‐year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations. International journal of paediatric dentistry, 21(4), 249-253 • Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Yalcin Cakir F, Ergin E. A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities. J Dent. 2020 Mar;94:103175 7. Class II cavities in primary molars. What material to use (Amalgam, Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified glass ionomer, Compomer, High-viscosity glass ionomer, bioactive materials like Activa). Factors affecting the choice. Bacteria accumulation according to material of use. Factors affecting the marginal adaptation and secondary caries. Clinical studies. • Papathanasiou A, Curzon M, Fairpo C. The Influence Of Restorative Material On The Survival Rate Of The Restorations In Primary Molars. Pediatr Dent. 1994; 16: 282-8. Peretz B, Ram D. Restorative material for children’s teeth: preferences or parents and children. J Dent Child 2002; v69:243-248. • Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7- year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 188–196. • Roberts MW, Moffa JP, Broring CL: Two-year clinical evaluation of a proprietary resin for the restoration of primary posterior teeth. Pediatr Dent 7:14-18, 1985. • Dermata A, Papageorgiou SN, Fragkou S, Kotsanos N. Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):393-401. • Boing TF, de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Gomes OMM. Are Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Lesions More Long-Lasting than Resin-based Composite Resins? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(5):435-452. • Chadwick BL, Evans DJ. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007 Mar;8(1):14-21. • Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, Corrêa MB. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):123-139. • Siokis V, Michailidis T Kotsanos N. Tooth-coloured materials for class II restorations in primary molars: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent (2021). • Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;24(5):423-9. • Dias AGA, Magno MB, Delbem ACB, Cunha RF, Maia LC, Pessan JP. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018 Jun;73:1-13. 8. Class II cavities in primary molars. Comparative studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing all above mentioned-materials materials and regarding success rate, factors affecting the success of restorations, factors of failure and clinical characteristics. Clinical studies (Randomized Controlled clinical Trials) – evidence. • Finucane D. Restorative treatment of primary teeth: an evidence-based narrative review. Aust Dent J. 2019 Jun;64 Suppl 1:S22-S36. • Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Osorio LB, Hadani PE, Pinto AS.Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(5):479–85. • Jones SE. The theory and practice of internal ‘tunnel’ restorations: a review of the literature and observations on clinical performance over eight years in practice. Prim Dent Care. 1999;6:93-100. Review. • Kotsanos N, Arizos S. Evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer serving both as indirect pulp therapy and as restorative material for primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12:170–5. • Raggio DP, Hesse D, Lenzi TL, Guglielmi CA, Braga MM Is Atraumatic restorative treatment an option for restoring occlusoproximal caries lesions in primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Nov;23(6):435-43. • Raggio DP, Tedesco TK, Calvo AF, Braga MM. Do glass ionomer cements prevent caries lesions in margins of restorations in primary teeth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Mar;147(3):177-85. • Randall RC, Mattias MA, Wrijhoef MA, Naim HF, Wilson NHF. Efficacy of performed metal crowns vs. amalgam restorations in primary molars: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:337-43. • Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz‐Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor‐Ejiofor Z. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 3. • Siokis V., Lazaridou D., Balasouli C., Arapostathis K., Kotsanos N. Correlation between cervical marginal adaptation and development of secondary caries in class II restorations with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in primary molars. Paidodontia 2014;28(3):119-124. • Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials: a review, Aust. Dent. J. 2004;49(3):112–121. • Weldon J.C., Yengopal V., Siegfried N., Gostemeyer G., Schwendicke F., Worthington H.V..Dental filling materials for managing carious lesions in the primary dentition Cochrane Systematic Review 2016 9. Stainless Steel Crowns (SSC). Types of SSC. Chemical composition. Placement procedure. Indications of SSC placement in permanent and primary teeth. Hall technique. Bacteria accumulation in SSC. Comparative studies between SSC and other types of restoration in primary teeth. Systematic reviews/ meta-analyses. Clinical studies – evidence. • Attari N, Roberts JF. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2006;7:58-63. • Croll TP, Castaldi CR. The preformed stainless steel crown for restoration of permanent posterior teeth in special cases. JADA. 1978;97:644-649 • Innes N.P., Evans D.J., Hall N. The Hall Technique for managing carious primary molars. Dent. Update. 2009;36:472–478 • Innes N.P., Stirrups D.R., Evans D.J., Hall N., Leggate M. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice: A retrospective analysis. Br. Dent. J. 2006;200:451–454 • Kotsanos N, Arhakis A. Pediatric Laboratory Manual. Greek Academic electronic books.2015 • McEvoy SA. Approximating stainless steel crowns in spaceloss quadrants. ASDC J Dent Child. 1977;44:105-107 • Seale NS ,Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns. A systematic Literature Review. Pediatr Dent,2015;37(2),145-60 • Zimmerman J.A., Feigal R.J., Till M.J., Hodges J.S. Parental attitudes on restorative materials as factors influencing current use in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr. Dent. 2009;31:63–70 • Chisini, L. A., Collares, K., Cademartori, M. G., de Oliveira, L. J. C., Conde, M. C. M., Demarco, F. F., & Corrêa, M. B. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2018;28(2), 123–139. 10. Aesthetic crowns in primary anterior and posterior teeth. Types. Pre-veneered stainless steel crowns (PVSSC) and pre-fabricated zirconia crowns (PZC). Placement procedure. Indications – Contra-indications. Materials for cementation. Retention. Bacteria accumulation in PVSSC and PZC. CAD-CAM technique. Comparison between SSC and aesthetic crowns (retention – periodontal health). Clinical Studies – evidence. • Aiem, E., Smaïl-Faugeron, V. and Muller-Bolla, M. (2017) ‘Aesthetic preformed paediatric crowns: systematic review’, International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 27(4), pp. 273–282. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12260. • Attari, N. and Roberts, J. F. (2006) ‘Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature.’, European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 7(2), pp. 58–62. doi: 10.12816/0010810. • Madrigal D, Viteri EM, Romero MR, Colmenares MM, Suárez A. Predisposing factors for gingival inflammation associated with steel crowns on temporary teeth in the pediatric population: a systematic literature review. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq 2014;26(1):152-63. • Kotsanos N, Arhakis A. Pediatric Laboratory Manual. Greek Academic electronic books.2015 • Mourouzis P, Arhakis A, Tolidis K. Computer-aided Design and Manufacturing Crown on Primary Molars: An Innovative Case Report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 J