PUBLIC ECONOMICS

“R” and Eviews 9 for panel and time series analysis

1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.A., and Yared, P., 2008. Income and democracy. American Economic Review 98, 808-842. 2. Cervellati, Matteo, Florian Jung, Uwe Sunde, and Thomas Vischer. 2014. Income and Democracy: Comment. American Economic Review, Vol. 104(2): 707-719. 3. Benhabib, J., Corvalan, A., Spiegel, M.M., 2013. Income and democracy: Evidence from nonlinear estimations. Economics Letters 118, 489-492. 4. Benito, E.M., Bartolucci, C., 2012. Income and democracy: Revisiting the evidence. Economics Letters 117, 844-847. 5. Heid, B., Langer, J., Larch, M., 2012. Income and democracy: Evidence from system GMM estimates. Economics Letters 116, 166-169. 6. Paleologou, S.M., 2015. Income and democracy: the modernization hypothesis re-visited via alternative non-linear models. Empirical Economics, Vol. 48: 909-921. Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J.A. 2006. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York and Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M.E., Cheibub, J. A., and Limongi, F. 2000. Democracy and development. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 7. Peacock, A and Scott, A (2000). The curious attraction of Wagner’s Law, Public Choice, 102, 1-17. 8. Wahab, M. (2004). Economic growth and expenditure: evidence from a new test specification, Applied Economics, 36, 2125-2135. 9. Kahn, J.A. (2011). Can we determine the optimal size of government? CATO Institute, 14(7), 1-10. 10. Henrekson, M. (1993). Wagner’s law: A spurious relationship? Public Finance 48, 406–415. 11. Courakis, A., Moura-Roque, F. and Tridimas, G. (1993). Public expenditure growth in Greece and Portugal: Wagner’s law and beyond, Applied Economics, 25, 125-134. 12. Ansari, M., Gordon, D and C. Akuamoah (1997). Keynes versus Wagner: public expenditure and the national income for three African counties, Applied Economics, 29, 543-550. 13. Ghali, K. H. (1999). Government size and economic growth: Evidence from a multivariate cointegration analysis, Applied Economics, 31, 975-987. 14. Narayan, P.K, Prasad, A. and Baljeet, S. (2000), A test of the Wagner’s hypothesis for the Fiji islands, Applied Economics, 40, 2793-2801. 15. Hsieh, E. and Lai, K. (1994). Government spending and economic growth, Applied Economics, 26, 535-42. 16. Kolluri, B. R., Panik, M. J. and Wahab, M. S. (2000). Government expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from G7 countries, Applied Economics, 32, pp. 1059-1068. 17. Paleologou, S. (2015). The long-run tendency of government expenditure: a semi-parametric modeling approach, Empirical Economics, forthcoming. 18. Sideris, D. (2007). Wagner’s Law in 19th century Greece: A cointegration and causality analysis, Bank of Greece, Working paper, No.64. 19. Thornton, J. (1999). Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s Law in 19th century Europe, Applied Economic Letters, 6, 413-416. Vamvoukas, G. A. (1999), The twin deficits phenomenon. Evidence from Greece, Applied Economics, 31: 1093-1100. 21. Leachman, L. and Francis, B. (2002), Twin deficits: Apparition or Reality? Applied Economics, 34: 1121-1132. 22. Bangai, A (2006), Structural breaks and the twin deficits hypothesis, International Economics and Economic Policy 3: 137-155. 23. Kalou, S., and Paleologou, S.M. (2012). The twin deficits hypothesis: Revisiting an EMU country Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(2): 230-241 24. Kaufmann, S., Scharler, J. and G. Winckler (2002), The Austrian current account deficit: driven by twin deficits or by intertemporal expenditure allocation? Empirical Economics, 27: 529-542. 25. Cavallo, M. (2005) Understanding the Twin Deficits: New Approaches, New Results, Federal Research Bank of San Francisco, Economic Letter, No. 16. 26. Abell, John D., (1990), Twin Deficits during the 1980s: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Macroeconomics, 12: 81-96.