PLANNING AND STRUCTURING PHYSICAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM

Course Information
TitleΣΧΕΔΙΑΣΜΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΞΙΟΛΟΓΗΣΗ ΑΝΑΛΥΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΩΝ ΣΤΗ ΦΥΣΙΚΗ ΑΓΩΓΗ / PLANNING AND STRUCTURING PHYSICAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM
CodeΦΑΜΚΑ7
FacultyPhysical Education and Sport Science
SchoolPhysical Education and Sports Sciences (Thessaloniki)
Cycle / Level2nd / Postgraduate
Teaching PeriodWinter
CoordinatorGeorgios Tzetzis
CommonNo
StatusActive
Course ID600015764

Programme of Study: PMS EKPAIDEUSĪ STĪ FYSIKĪ AGŌGĪ KAI STĪN PROSARMOSMENĪ-EIDIKĪ FYSIKĪ AGŌGĪ (2021-sīmera)

Registered students: 21
OrientationAttendance TypeSemesterYearECTS
EKPAIDEUTIKA MONTELA STĪ FYSIKĪ AGŌGĪElective Course belonging to the selected specialization (Elective Specialization Course)Winter-10

Class Information
Academic Year2025 – 2026
Class PeriodWinter
Faculty Instructors
Weekly Hours3
Total Hours39
Class ID
600288985
Course Type 2021
Specific Foundation
Course Type 2011-2015
Knowledge Deepening / Consolidation
Mode of Delivery
  • Distance learning
Language of Instruction
  • Greek (Instruction, Examination)
Learning Outcomes
1. IObjectives and evaluation of syllabi in PE. Current research trends Characteristics of quality programs in PA The NASPE PE program model International trends in exercise PA and FD programs The evaluation methods of the systematic observation of the F.A. programs. Models of the systematic observation of the F.A. programs. The role of the FA and FD school Assessment and grading in physical education Foundations for curriculum design Values and philosophical orientation of curricula in Physical Education Syllabus models in PE Understanding through design Examples from model curricula in Physical Education Analytical program and educational reform After completing the study in the specific course, the students: • They will understand the structure and parameters of planning and evaluating educational programs • They will be able to design programs and organize small-scale evaluation of educational programs • They will have knowledge of planning and methods of implementation and evaluation of the work of the course teacher and the student.
General Competences
  • Apply knowledge in practice
  • Retrieve, analyse and synthesise data and information, with the use of necessary technologies
  • Adapt to new situations
  • Make decisions
  • Work autonomously
  • Work in teams
  • Work in an international context
  • Work in an interdisciplinary team
  • Generate new research ideas
  • Design and manage projects
  • Be critical and self-critical
  • Advance free, creative and causative thinking
Course Content (Syllabus)
Οbjectives and evaluation of syllabi in PE. Current research trends Characteristics of quality programs in PA NASPE's PE Program Model Objectives, Objectives, and Evaluation of Syllabus in PE. Current research trends Characteristics of quality programs in PA The NASPE PE program model International trends in exercise PA and FD programs The evaluation methods of the systematic observation of the F.A. programs. Models of the systematic observation of the F.A. programs. The role of the FA and FD school Assessment and grading in physical education Foundations for curriculum design Values and philosophical orientation of curricula in Physical Education Syllabus models in PE Understanding through design Examples from model curricula in Physical Education Analytical program and educational reform
Keywords
teaching of sport skills, physical education goals
Educational Material Types
  • Notes
  • Slide presentations
  • Video lectures
  • Multimedia
  • Interactive excersises
Use of Information and Communication Technologies
Use of ICT
  • Use of ICT in Course Teaching
  • Use of ICT in Laboratory Teaching
  • Use of ICT in Communication with Students
  • Use of ICT in Student Assessment
Description
Distance learning and blended teaching with the use of presentation and communications software
Course Organization
ActivitiesWorkloadECTSIndividualTeamworkErasmus
Lectures15
Laboratory Work15
Reading Assigment10
Exams60
Total100
Student Assessment
Description
Written exams, oral presentation, written projects
Student Assessment methods
  • Written Exam with Multiple Choice Questions (Formative, Summative)
  • Written Exam with Short Answer Questions (Formative, Summative)
  • Written Exam with Extended Answer Questions (Formative, Summative)
  • Written Exam with Problem Solving (Formative, Summative)
Bibliography
Additional bibliography for study
1. Blythe T. (1997). The Teaching for Understanding Guide. Jossey-Bass (http://learnweb.harvard.edu/alps/tfu/index.cfm). 2. Grover, A. B., Lim, A., & Hadley, D. E. (2016). Interprofessional education and the new educator: Getting started with planning and implementation. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 73(13), 950-954. 3. Henson, K. T. (2015). Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform. Waveland Press. 4. Jewett, A.E., Bain, L.L., & Ennis, C.D. (1996). The curriculum process in physical education. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark 5. Kalantzis M., Cope B. (2008). New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge University Press (http://neamathisi.com/new-learning/)Lacy, A. C., & Williams, S. M. (2018). Measurement and evaluation in physical education and exercise science. Routledge. 6. Kelly, L., Melograno, V. (2004). Developing the Physical Education Curriculum: An Achievement-Based Approach. Human Kinetics. 7. Melograno, V.J. (1997). Designing the physical education curriculum. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics. 8. Metzler, M. (2017). Instructional models in physical education. Routledge. 9. Croft, S. J., Roberts, M. A., & Stenhouse, V. L. (2015). The perfect storm of education reform: High-stakes testing and teacher evaluation. Social Justice, 42(1). 10. McGoey, T., Root, Z., Bruner, M. W., & Law, B. (2016). Evaluation of physical activity interventions in children via the reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized trials. Preventive medicine, 82, 8-19. 11. Ozgul, F., Kangalgil, M., Diker, G., & Yamen, E. (2018). Evaluation of the Constructivist Learning Environments of Physical Education Teacher Candidates. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 653-658. 12. Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage publications. 13. Wiggins G., McTighe J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd edition). Pearson (http://www.ubdexchange.org/index.cfm). 14. Wiggins G., McTighe J. (2008). Put understanding first. Reshaping High Schools, 65, 36-41.
Last Update
29-06-2023