Semiotic and Intersemiotic Approaches in Digital Humanities

Students must be acquainted with the theory of semiotics and culture and must have computer skills.

The course is based on digital tools and thus presupposes the use of specific applications in computer lab. AUTh elearning platform will be used.

Evaluation upon project (3.500-5.000 words).

Δημητρούλια, Ξ., Τικτοπούλου, Α., 2015. Ψηφιακές λογοτεχνικές σπουδές. [ηλεκτρ. βιβλ.] Αθήνα:Σύνδεσμος Ελληνικών Ακαδημαϊκών Βιβλιοθηκών. Διαθέσιμο στο: http://hdl.handle.net/11419/5827 (59303588) Λαγόπουλος, Α., Boklund-Λαγοπούλου Κ., Θεωρία Σημειωτικής. Αθήνα: Πατάκης (59370152)

Berry, D. M. (Ed.) (2012). Understanding digital humanities. Hampshire: Palgrave. Bogost, I. (2008). The Rhetoric of Video Games. In Katie Salen (Ed.), The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning, (117–140). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. De Souza, C. (2005). The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. DHQ (Digital Humanities Quarterly), 5 (1), http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html. Eskelinen, M. (2012). Cybertext Poetics: The Critical Landscape of New Media Literary Theory (International Texts in Critical Media Aesthetics). London: Continuum. Frasca G. (1999). Ludology Meets Narratology: Similitude and differences between (video)games and narrative. https://ludology.typepad.com/weblog/articles/ludology.htm Frasca, G. (2003). Simulation versus Narrative: Introduction to Ludology. In Wolf, M.J.P. & Perron, B. (Eds.) The Video Game Theory Reader. (221-236), New York: Routledge. Iedema. R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2 (1), 29-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751. Jameson F. (1991). Postmodernism or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press. Jenkins, H. (2011). Transmedia 101: Further Reflections. Confessions of an AcaFan. http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2007/03/transmedia_storytelling_101.html. Jenkins, H. (2011). Transmedia 202: Further Reflections. Confessions of an AcaFan. http://henryjenkins.org/2011/08/defining_transmedia_further_re.html. Jewitt, C. & Henriksen, B. (2016). Social Semiotic Multimodality. In Nina-Maria Klug and Hartmut Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext/Handbook of Language in Multimodal Contexts (145-164). De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099 Jewitt, C. (Ed.) (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd Εd.) London: Routledge. Juul, J. (1998). A Clash between Game and Narrative. Paper presented at the Digital Arts and Culture conference, Bergen, Norway. https://www.jesperjuul.net/text/clash_between_game_and_narrative.html Lemke, J. L. (2009). Multimodal Genres and Transmedia Traversals: Social Semiotics and the Political Economy of the sign. Semiotica, 177 (1-4), 1-27. Lotman, Y. & Uspensky, B. (1978). On the Semiotic Mechanism of Culture. New Literary History, 9(2), 211-232. Lotman, Y. (1984/2005). On the Semiosphere. Sign System Studies, 11(1), 201-229. Manovich, L. (2012). How to compare one million images? In D. Berry (Ed.), Understanding digital humanities (249–278). London: Macmillan. McPherson, T. (2009). Introduction: Media studies and the digital humanities. Cinema Journal , 48 (2), 119–123. O’Halloran K. (2015) Multimodal Digital Humanities. In Trifonas P. (Ed.) International Handbook of Semiotics (pp. 383–409). Dordrecht: Springer. O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Companion to discourse analysis (pp. 120–137). London: Continuum. O’Halloran, K. L., Chua, A. & Podlasov A. (2014). The role of images in social media analytics: A multimodal digital humanities approach. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 565–588). Berlin: De Gruyter. O’Halloran, K. L., Marissa K. L. E. & Tan, S. (2014). Multimodal analytics: Software and visualization techniques for analyzing and interpreting multimodal data. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd Ed) (pp. 386–396). London: Routledge. O’Halloran, K. L., Marissa K. L. E., A. Podlasov, and S. Tan (2013). Multimodal digital semiotics: The interaction of language with other resources. Text and Talk, 33 (4–5), 665–690. Special Edition for Michael Halliday (edited by Geoff Thompson). O’Halloran, K. L., Podlasov, A., Chua, A. & Marissa, K. L. E. (2012). Interactive software for multimodal analysis. Visual Communication, 11 (3), 352–370. : Special Issue Multimodal Methodologies. O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S. & Marissa, K. L. E. (2015). Multimodal semiosis and semiotics. In J. Webster (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to M.A.K. Halliday (pp. 386–411). London: Bloomsbury. O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Smith, B. A., & Podlasov, A. (2010). Challenges in Designing Digital Interfaces for the Study of Multimodal Phenomena. Information Design Journal, 18(1), 2-12. Petridis P. (forthcoming). Anthropological Role-playing Games as Multimodal Pedagogical Tools: Rhetoric, Simulation and Critique. Entanglements: experiments in multimodal ethnography, 3(2). Rajewsky, I. O. (2005). Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality. Intermédialités / Intermediality, (6), 43–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1005505ar. Rockwell, G. & Sinclair, S. (2016). Hermeneutica: Computer-Assisted Interpretation in the Humanities. Cambridge, MΑ.: MIT Press, http://hermeneuti.ca. Ryan, M.-L. (2006). Avatars of Story (Electronic Mediations). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Stockinger, P. (2015). The semiotic turn in digital archives and libraries. Les Cahiers du numérique, 11 (1), 57-82, https://www.cairn.info/revue-les-cahiers-du-numerique-2015-1-page-57.htm. Svensson, P. (2010). The landscape of digital humanities. DHQ (Digital Humanities Quarterly), 4(1). http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/4/1/000080/000080.html. Whelan A., & Nowak, R. (2018). Vaporwave Is (Not) a Critique of Capitalism: Genre Work in An Online Music Scene. Open Cultural Studies, 2, 451-462 Αντωνοπούλου, Α., Καρακάση, Α., Πετροπούλου, Π. (2015). Διακαλλιτεχνικότητα - Διαμεσικότητα. Στο Αντωνοπούλου, Α., Καρακάση, Α., Πετροπούλου, Π., Συγκριτολογία. Αθήνα: Σύνδεσμος Ελληνικών Ακαδημαϊκών Βιβλιοθηκών. http://hdl.handle.net/11419/4337. Δημητρούλια, Τ. (2006). Κυβερνολογοτεχνία: μια πρόκληση του μέλλοντος. Σύγκριση/Comparaison, 17, 94-113. Δημητρούλια, Τ. (υπό δημ.). Ηλεκτρονικά υποστηριζόμενη ανάλυση κειμένου: νέες ερμηνευτικές προοπτικές. προβληματισμοί και προκλήσεις. Αθήνα: Ψηφιακές εκδόσεις ΚΕΑΕ. Δημητρούλια, Ξ. & Τικτοπούλου, Α. (2015). Ψηφιακές λογοτεχνικές σπουδές. Αθήνα: Σύνδεσμος Ελληνικών Ακαδημαϊκών Βιβλιοθηκών. http://hdl.handle.net/11419/5827. Λαγόπουλος, Α. & Boklund-Λαγοπούλου Κ. (2016). Θεωρία Σημειωτικής. Αθήνα: Πατάκης Παπαηλία Π. & Πετρίδης Π. 2015. Ψηφιακή εθνογραφία. Αθήνα: Σύνδεσμος Ελληνικών Ακαδημαϊκών Βιβλιοθηκών. http://repfiles.kallipos.gr/html_books/15369/ Πετρίδης Π. Διαδικτυακά παιχνίδια και ψηφιακές ανθρωπιστικές επιστήμες: Τα machinima ως μέσο εθνογραφικής αναπαράστασης και ως μεθοδολογικό και εκπαιδευτικό εργαλείο στο πλαίσιο της ανθρωπολογίας» (υπό δημ.). Στο Πετρίδης Π. κ.ά. (επιμ.), Ψηφιακές Ανθρωπιστικές Επιστήμες στην Ελλάδα: προβληματισμοί και προκλήσεις. Αθήνα: Ψηφιακές εκδόσεις ΚΕΑΕ.