Course Content (Syllabus)
Parmenides and Heraclitus were presented by Plato as antipodes: The former appears to maintain a universal unity of everything, negating thus with his rigid monism the world, while the latter ("everything flows") seems to invalidate any constant measure. This antithetical relationship has often been questioned, but also reinforced by the assumption that the allegedly later Parmenides in some of his fragments criticizes Heraclitus. At the other end of the tradition we encounter Martin Heidegger, whose idiosyncratic interpretations insist that both thinkers think and name "the same", i.e. Being. Through these interpretative perspectives, we will attempt to approach the two thinkers in their diversity, as the two most important and original figures of early Greek philosophy.