Ήχοι και Ομιλία

- 2 Εργασίες μικρής έκτασης επίλυσης προβλημάτων: 24% - 1 Ομαδική Παρουσίαση: 16% - 1 Ατομική Παρουσίαση σχετική με το τελικό άρθρο: 20% - 1 Άρθρο: 40%

GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY Cairns, C. & E. Raimy (eds.). 2010. Handbook of the Syllable. Leiden: Brill. de Lacy, P. (ed.). 2007. The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge University Press. Goldsmith, J., J. Riggle & A. Yu (eds). 2011. The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd ed. Wiley. Gussenhoven, C. & H. Jacobs. 2011. Understanding phonology. London: Hodder Education. Hall, T.Α. 2007. Segmental features. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 311–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hayes, B., R. Kirchner & D. Steriade (eds.). 2004. Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge University Press. Inkelas, S. 2014. The Interplay of Morphology and Phonology. Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology 8. Oxford University Press. Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press. Kager, R. 2007. Feet and metrical stress. In The Cambridge handbook of phonology, P. de Lacy (ed.), pp. 195-227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kula, N., B. Botma & K. Nasukawa (eds.). 2011. The Continuum Companion to Phonology. Bloomsbury Publishing. McCarthy, J. & A. Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology: 79–153. Odden, D. 2013. Introducing phonology. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Oostendorp, M. van., C. Ewen, B. Hume, & K. Rice (eds.) 2011. Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Wiley. Ryan, K. 2016. Phonological weight. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(12). 720–733. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12229. Zec, D. 2007. The syllable. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 161–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. SOME MORE SPECIFIC BIBLIOGRAPHY Blumenfeld, L. 2011. Coercion and minimality. Linguistic Review 28(2). 207–240. doi:10.1515/tlir.2011.006. Davis, S. 1999a. On the representation of initial geminates. Phonology 16: 93-104. Davis, S. 1999b. On the Moraic Representation of Underlying Geminates: Evidence from Prosodic Morphology. In H. van der Hulst, R. Kager, and W. Zonneveld (eds.), The Prosody-Morphology Interface, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39-61 Davis, S. 2003. The controversy over geminates and syllable weight. In Caroline Fery & Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The Syllable in Optimality Theory, pp. 77-98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davis, S. 2011. Geminates. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds). Chapter 37, pp. 873-897. Wiley. Dmitrieva, O. 2012. Gemination Typology and the Perception of Consonant Duration. Ph.D. thesis, University of Stanford. Fitzgerald, C. 2016. Morphology in the Muskogean languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(12). 681–700. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12227. Gordon, M. 2005. A Perceptually-Driven Account of Onset-Sensitive Stress. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(3). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 595–653. doi:10.1007/s11049-004-8874-9. Gordon, M. 2006. Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology. Originally 1999 UCLA Ph.D. thesis. London/New York: Routledge. Ham, W. 2001. Phonetic and Phonological Aspects of Geminate Timing. New York/London: Routledge. Hayes, B. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 253-306. Hume, E., J. Muller & A. van Engelenhoven. 1997. Non-moraic geminates in Leti. Phonology 14: 371-402. Kavitskaya, D. 2017. Compensatory Lengthening And Structure Preservation Revisited Yet Again. On looking into words (and beyond): Structures, Relations, Analyses , 41–58. Berlin: Language Science Press. Kawahara, S. 2007. Sonorancy and geminacy. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 32: 145-186. McCarthy, J.J. & A. Prince. 1999. Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In R. Kager, H. van der Hulst & W. Zonneveld (eds.), The Prosody-Morphology Interface, pp. 218–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Morén, B. 1999. Distinctiveness, Coercion and Sonority: A Unified Theory of Weight. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland. Muller, J. 2001. The Phonology and Phonetics of Word-Initial Geminates. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University. Prince, A. & P. Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Blackwell [first circulated as Prince & Smolensky (1993) Technical reports of the Rutgers University Center of Cognitive Science]. Ringen, C. & R. Vago. 2011. Geminates: heavy or long? In Charles Cairns & Eric Raimy (eds.), Handbook of the Syllable, pp. 155-169. Leiden: Brill. Ryan, K. 2014. Onsets contribute to syllable weight: Statistical evidence from stress and meter. Language 90(2): 309–341. Ryan, K. to appear. Prosodic weight: categories and continua. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Topintzi, N. 2010. Onsets: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Topintzi, N. & S. Davis. 2017. On the Weight of Edge Geminates. In Haruo Kubozono (ed.), Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants, 260–282. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Topintzi, N. & A. Nevins. 2017. Moraic onsets in Arrernte. Phonology 34(3): 615–650. doi:10.1017 /S0952675717000306. Topintzi, N. & E. Zimmermann. Submitted. Containment as the key to the “heavy-vs-long” geminate debate. Linguistic Inquiry. Tranel, B. 1991. CVC light syllables, geminates, and moraic theory. Phonology 8: 291-302.